At the end of the lighting section of The Art of Photography
I identified a need to learn more about studio lighting and suggested I should
attend a course to assist with this. On
28 April I attended Scott Kelby’s Light it, Shoot it, Retouch it seminar.
Scott Kelby’s books provided me with an introduction to
photography a few years back and although his approach may be somewhat
unconventional I found him useful when trying to find my way around a
camera. His books were certainly more
informative that the manual that came with the camera.
When I learnt that he was bringing his latest seminar to the
UK I felt it was worth going to.
Here are some of my thoughts from the day.
Content
The seminar consisted of various studio shoots using
models. The aim was to show you how to
set up the lighting, how to do the shoot and then how to retouch it using
Lightroom and Photoshop. Each attendee
was given a CD with the seminar workbook and all the information and
tenchniques used during the day to take home.
This CD is pretty well put together and a lot more informative that the
usual printed notes that are handed out at these types of courses.
The duration of the seminar was approximately 6 hours which
was quite long in comparison to some of the half day lighting courses I have
seen offered elsewhere. However, the
main drawback with this seminar is that there were about 350 attendees whereas
the shorter courses were more hands on.
Scott Kelby’s presentation was good, but I have to say
through my studies with the OCA and on this course (TAOP) he falls short when
it comes to actually teaching. He is
funny and his sardonic wit filtered through in every lesson but he tends to
(like in his books) try and simply photography and the techniques required to
achieve the end results. For example, he
tends to give you instructions about how to take a shot without explaining
why. This was particularly frustrating
when he carried out the retouching on his images where measurements and values
were bandied about but no explanation as to why you would use these
settings.
Learning outcomes
I have given quite a bit of thought to what I learnt from
this seminar and I feel that most of my learning was not about lighting at
all. I think that perhaps my feeling
that I don’t understand or get studio work is a perceived weakness than an
actual weakness that I have. I think
maybe I felt intimidated by it all at the beginning of the lighting section of
the course and that these feelings have continued to grow.
I learnt the benefits of shooting tethered which is
something I have never done. However, as
my camera is a Nikon shooting tethered means I have to purchase Camera Control
Pro 2 in order to do this.
I enjoyed the retouching sections of the seminar as I don’t
tend to shoot portraits very often and therefore haven’t explored the
possibilities that Photoshop has to offer when it comes to enhancing portraits. As there was a lot of information to take in
on this part of the course I am glad to have the very detailed workbook notes
on my CD.
I also liked the quick overview they did on
compositing. I have heard this technique
bandied about a lot lately and wondered what the big deal was. The results of the shoot at the seminar were
pretty good but I still haven’t made up my mind on how I feel about the ‘look’.
Negatives
- Large audience and no one-to-one hands on tuition
- Big emphasis on the kit you need to have making you feel like if you didn’t part with your cash and invest in a big lighting set up all your images were going to be rubbish.
- Targeted at individuals who feel that because they own a DSLR they should have the right to call themselves professional photographers. Devalued the amount of learning and practice that is required to be a good photographer by giving the illusion that all you needed to know about photography could be learnt in one day.
- Focussed solely on portrait photography, would have been nice to have a session on product photography.
- The room in the Business Design Centre wasn’t the best when it came to layout. Tiered seating would be advantageous and would also mean people could see the stage better.
- Seemed to be a little bit of hero worshipping going on with the queues at each break to get Kelby’s autograph and have your picture taken with him. I also felt a little disconcerted by the ‘who has the best kit’ competition that seemed to go on amongst the attendees as the day progressed. Surely the aim of the seminar was to learn not to find out who had the biggest and most expensive lens.
All in all I am glad that I attended the seminar as despite
some of the negatives there were benefits for me too. I think that the course reinforced for me how
much I have learnt since I first read Scott Kelby’s books a number of years
ago. I learnt that I should consider
exploring Photoshop more and see if how it can enhance my work. I think for future learning I would benefit
for the more hands on approach of a smaller group with a dedicated tutor.
No comments:
Post a Comment